Corruption - who pays??

        The Charbonneau commission recently revealed the degree to which the Québec construction industry is infiltrated by organized crime (mafia).

- Cartels to fix prices and determine whose "turn" it is to get a city contract apparently are common in some large municipalities like Montréal. 

- Kick backs to corrupt civic officials inflate the cost of municipal contracts to taxpayers (who already complain about being overtaxed). Thus, exorbitant - and unnecessary - cost overruns are overlooked by those payed to monitor civic expenditures (in return for a chunk of the overrun or lavish gifts or cheap house renovations, etc). 

- Commentators estimate that taxpayers are getting dinged to the tune of 30% of the real cost of municipal contracts. 

          Outrageous! This is the stuff revolutions are made of..

highway closed by debris falling from overpass

            If it only ended there it would be bad enough - but it doesn't just end at the public being cheated. Property is being damaged or destroyed, people have actually died. Saturday, September 30, 2006 near Montréal, Québec, a section of overpass falls onto the highway below, crushing two vehicles. Toll: 5 dead, 6 seriously injured. The resulting inquiry produced a litany of faulty design features, missed inspections, sloppy work and maintenance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_la_Concorde_overpass_collapse

            And if a mafia polluted construction industry in cahoots with corrupt municipal officials were not bad enough we also have to contend with the logical inanity and moral depravity of neo-conservative inspired cuts to regulatory agencies.

". Accused of consistently putting off repairs to pass balanced budgets, the Quebec government has since increased spending on highways and projects and has increased infrastructure spending for future budgets."

          Right! The public pays less taxes for less services to obtain those sacrosanct balanced budgets and people have to die for it - right? The irony, of course, is that some of the good bourgeoisie dying probably voted for the neo-con budget cutters whose policies killed them. Instant Karma..

         On a deeper level what, if anything, does the Charbonneau Commission teach us? The message is actually a pretty mixed one, from my reading. The positive side is that we live in a society in which - at least in principle and, from time to time in reality - public officials are held accountable for their management of the commonwealth or common good. Apparently the process is cyclic. Corruption builds up over time. The public becomes scandalized due to the action of a few muckraker journalists and other do gooders (footnote 1). A big stink follows - like the Charbonneau Commission and its potential sequels. The old bums - the masters of the Old Political System - are thrown out. They are replaced by younger - or in times of rapid transition - young idealists. The system is reformed and runs cleanly for a few decades. Then, the rot of cronyism inevitably sets in. Corruption spreads and in about 40 years, you are back where you began again. This cyclic nature of corruption / collective cleansing might provide a minimalist functional definition of democracy: democracy is a means of keeping the political, economic and social systems on a relatively even keel by periodically purging them of corrupting influences. Like a good purge or sauna every couple of weeks..

          I suspect that another reading might be that democracy has to be "returned" to the people (if ever it was taken away in the first place..) This is a problem raised by French sociologist Jean Claude Guillebaud in his work. At the beginning of the Revolutionary Era - the American and French Revolutions, latter part of the 18th century - things seemed pretty straight forward. The Three Revolutionary Principles of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity appeared non-contradictory. But, over time, the very success of the revolutionary bourgeoisie revealed contradictions between the three revolutionary principles. Freedom, unfettered, allowed some individuals to accumulate "excessive" amounts of wealth which in turn, gave them more power over others with less wealth. Thus freedom was found to be, partly, opposed to equality. Fraternity has also proven elusive when inequalities of wealth pass certain, hard to define, limits.

           It is likely that the coming ecological / demographic / economic / social crises will force us to re-evaluate the Three Revolutionary Principles and their value in modern technical societies. We will be forced to assess the possibility of achieving some form of them in the post cheap energy era we are now entering. We are already seeing some of these re-evaluations taking place in North America over the question of security. Since the 9-11 terrorist attacks, Americans have come to prioritize "security" over "freedom": "if you are not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear" is an argument used to rationalize increased surveillance by the state or private corporations payed by the state to enact such surveillance. This is one possible choice..

            An epoch like the one we are entering may, if we play our hands well, actually serve to re-invigorate the revolutionary principles. This would happen if, for example, reduced per capital energy consumption led to the decentralization of economic activity coupled with concurrent democratization of ownership of the means of production (worker coops, worker / consumer coops, creative schemes of social enterprise..)

           Whatever the long term outcome of the Charbonneau Commission it has served a necessary reminder - to be administered periodically! In matters of corruption, it is always the public who pays in the long run.

internal blog links: keywords: Charbonneau (7 entries)

footnotes:

1- muckraker: a militant, investigative journalist fighting for social justice or other Common Good causes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muckraker

Are we, well.., decadant?

           Speaking as a Canadian and a North American, it is probably safe to say that we are not immune to the political and racial fanaticism that are emerging as disquieting symptoms of social decadence in Europe. Witness the recent debate in Québec over banning the wearing of "ostentatious religious symbols" by employees of public institutions: hospitals, government offices, schools, day cares..

left-wing-populism-in-quebec  (internal blog link)

             Ultimately, one can begin to pose questions about the long term viability of democracy in radically inegalitarian, capitalist / corporatist economies. Already, one begins to see the beginings of this questioning among political scientists:

link - democracy bankrupt?

             One of the things that strikes one as a "sign of the times": the nastiness of political debate. Why such nastiness in supposedly affluent societies where everyone (supposedly) has enough to eat? This may have a rational explanation: empty barrels make the most noise. When political parties have nothing to offer, they go on the attack. This is a way of hiding their intellectual vacuousness and moral bankruptcy: their sole reason for existing is to prop up a dying Old Regime as long as possible. This is the core set of values of reactionary politics, very visible in North America today. Just think of election time "attack" or "negative" ads. Our political leaders, with few exceptions, cannot be positive exactly because they have no proposals, no program founded in a critical analysis of reality. One gets the impression that our democratic institutions are exhausted.

link: noam-chomsky,10-strategies-of-manipulation

              Everywhere a "devil may care" attitude flourishes. Witness the antics recently of Toronto's high living, crack smoking, "man of the people" mayor Rob Ford.

link: character assassination as politics

               Everything which is "virile" - mean spirited, vicious, violent - is lauded. Cynicism is the norm, especially among the young. Many are convinced that all politicians are crooks, something which the Charboneau Commission hearings into corruption in the construction industry in Québec tend to confirm. 

 internal blog links:

http://transparencycanada.blogspot.ca/2012/10/charbonneau-commission-when.html

http://transparencycanada.blogspot.ca/2012/11/the-right-hand-knows-not-what-left-hand.html

http://transparencycanada.blogspot.ca/2012/11/turning-over-rocks-things-you-find.html 

http://transparencycanada.blogspot.ca/2013/06/montreal-rock-n-roll.html 


                These are dangerous times. It is at such times that the disempowered and the disenfranchised finally opt out of the System and begin searching for Messiahs to save them. This has had terrible consequences in the 20th century. One need only think of the great dictators that century produced: Hitler, Stalin, Mao.. 

                Fascism caught the Left like a bolt out of the blue. Not only had they not predicted it's emergence in the first decades of the twentieth century but they did not really understand it. It is only with the 20 / 20 vision of retrospection, fifty years after its birth, could the Left say that it had some sort of an intellectual handle on fascism. And what we do know is not very encouraging..

                One definition of fascism: the control or seizure of the State by the corporate elite. That sounds like North America today. One need only compare, for example, the Harper government's environmental policies and the desires of the petrochemical industry to see much overlap there is. Harper's environmental policy could have been written in the Oil Patch (cynics say it was). Young people understand things like this viscerally and its corrupting influence both on them and on the political process itself.

                One of the strategies worked out by the fascists early on (program of the Italian fascist party, circa 1920), was what one can call "contemporary populism". Fascism / populism aims to bypass the logical, critical thinking circuits of the brain and tap directly into the reptilian brain.

              Dimetrodon: an early synapsid reptile (Permian era - 275 million years ago)
            Mammals are modern or surviving synapsids. Dimetrodon slumbers in the                    core of our mammalian brains..

           Since reptiles were the earliest terrestrial vertebrates from which the rest evolved, their brains are involved in computing the basic stuff: sex, aggression and flight, the stuff you need to survive but not much more. The rawest, most powerful emotional, instinctive stuff. This is what the fascists aim to tap into. Their males want our women: a traditional motivational ploy of the racist. They want to take over the world. They want to destroy our values and our way of life. Everything is simple, black and white - as befits a small, early model vertebrate brain.

             But the reptile slumbers in all of us (till awakened). The fascist wants to tweak Dimetrodon's tail, stomp on it. They want to connect the raw emotions stimulated and liberated to cues: racial, religious, gender-orientation or political epithets. The goal is to get a knee jerk - unthinking "conditioned" - reflex when the cues are presented. Thus, critical rational thinking - emerging in higher (non-reptilian) brain centers - is bypassed by raw, survival oriented emotion. This was all well spelled out in the first Fascist Party program (circa 1920, Rome). Contemporary North American reactionaries have refined the procedures (many are from advertising firms and corporate funded Right wing think tanks including university profs). More sophistication in programming and delivery but the basic principles are the same. In the third link from the top, Toronto's high-flyin' populist mayor smears - by insinuation - an adversarial journalist with the hate label, "pedophile". The connection is obvious: threat to children (our children!) has been linked to this man, his name and, of course, his future opinions expressed in his columns.

             The reassertion of populism, reactionary politics and even neo-nazi movements is a worrying sign, if the history of the 20th century is any judge...

Turning over rocks: the things you find..

           When I was a child, there was a patch of undeveloped swampy land behind our house, fed by a spring. There was tall grass, so high I remember it being over my head - fantastic place to hide! There were big grass snakes slithering around, hunting. And there was a shallow bog which held water all year round, except when it froze solid in winter. In the higher, drier spots of the bog there were discarded bits of lumber and some big rocks. When you turned these over you would find an amazing zoo of light shunning creatures: ant colonies, spiders, centipedes, earwigs, worms, woodlice.. I even saw my first slime mold ameba.. Sadistically, I would occasionally lure another kid to see one of my prized "collections" of creepy-crawlers. Sometimes I wouldn't have time to finish turning over a rotten board or a flat rock before I saw their backside cutting a wake through the tall grass to get the hell out there as fast as possible..

           When governments lose contact with their true function: to provide services essential for the maintenance of a civlilized society, they become like that bog of stagnant water. Strange lifeforms which shun the light of day proliferate and take over. When the bog becomes too stagnant and stinks too much people finally decide to drain it and clean it up. Investigators, whistle blowers and muck-raking journalists turn over rocks and expose what has been hidden to the light of day. This is what transparency looks like in action..

           Québec province's Charbonneau Commission into organized crime influence in the construction industry has claimed its first victims.

            Montréal mayor Gérald Temblay decided to step down as the heat went up and accusations of corrupt practices in the metropole's city hall came to light. As Don Macpherson noted in a recent column, the Charbonneau Commission also has a mandate to investigate corrupt political linkages between the construction industry and the financing of political parties, both municipal and provincial. These links may prove the greatest embarrassment of all. Mayor Temblay denied any knowlege of inflated contract prices and an organized system of kickbacks to collaborating city officials in Montréal. But resign he did and not without signficant political fallout. The Mayor's ruling municipal party found itself so weakened and morally compromised that it was forced to cancel tax hikes that been announced a mere two days earlier. The municipal tax hike was pared back from 3.3% to 2.2%, reflecting the annual inflation rate. It was simply too embarrassing to demand super-inflationary tax hikes while city hall is under suspicion of accepting bribes from mafia-ridden construction companies to inflate city contracts. Contracts may have been, in some cases, inflated as much as 30 to 40% over their real value. Corrupted city officials are alleged to have received skim-offs of 2 to 3% of the final contract value to let the inflated estimates pass without question.

              There has already been blow back from the Charbonneau Commission at the provincial level. Ex-premier Jean Charest (Libéral) was, more or less, forced to call an early, summer election rather than face the storm of corruption charges that the Commission would unleash. He lost that election..

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Macpherson+Charbonneau+commission+least+some+Quebec/7512778/story.html

             Nor were Mayor Tremblay and Premier Charest the only early victims. The city of Laval's "king", Gilles Vaillancourt, was forced to fall on his sword after a 23 year reign. The heads have only started to roll, one suspects..

              Investigators are looking into allegations that Mayor Vaillancourt funneled millions of dollars of dirty money into overseas tax havens. In addition, two provincial officials have stepped forward claiming that he offered them illegal political contributions.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/11/06/laval-mayor-gilles-vaillancourt-steps-down.html

             A smorgasbord of articles on the Charbonneau Commission by Macleans Magazine:

http://www2.macleans.ca/tag/charbonneau-commission/ 

internal blog link: http://transparencycanada.blogspot.ca/2012/11/the-right-hand-knows-not-what-left-hand.html

While the inquiry is usually described as being into corruption into the construction industry, its mandate also includes possible connections to political financing.

Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Macpherson+Charbonneau+commission+least+some+Quebec+politicians+nervous/7512778/story.html#ixzz2Co9uQ55x

While the inquiry is usually described as being into corruption into the construction industry, its mandate also includes possible connections to political financing.

Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Macpherson+Charbonneau+commission+least+some+Quebec+politicians+nervous/7512778/story.html#ixzz2Co9uQ55x

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charbonneau_Commission

The right hand knows not what the left hand does..

           According to conventional neoconservative, Free Market ideology, reducing the size of government and eliminating regulatory mechanisms leads to increased efficiency (government is defined to be inefficient as an axiom of the belief system whether or not, in any given instance, it actually is).

           Like many "common sense" propositions, "cutting fat to improve efficiency" is, at best, only partly true, of limited (though real) applicability. Like all good, but limited, ideas, carrying it to illogical limits leads to destructive, counterproductive blowback (unintended consequences). 

           A good example of the such blowback was revealed in the Charbonneau Commission's investigation into corruption in the construction industry in the Province of Québec.

Wiki: Charbonneau Commission

            Budget cuts can lead to increased expenses in the long run, if they are not judiciously implemented and monitored to optimize the benefit to cost ratio of services provided to the public sector (that is, if cuts are implemented in a hamfisted, ideologically driven fashion). 

            One of the witnesses being grilled before the Charbonneau Commission into construction industry corruption in the city of Montréal observed that staff reductions in the Montréal Public Works Dept meant that oversight of public work contracts was reduced. The reduced oversight had the perverse, counterproductive effect of making it easier to inflate cost estimates and pay off corrupted officials. For example, cost overruns on projects would be inflated or simply invented with a kickback payed to a corrupted civil engineer so he would approve the additional billing. In addition, with oversight delegated to private sector consulting firms, the city lost the inhouse competency to carry out its own monitoring. This lead to increased costs for oversight and / or to reduced capacity. So the net effect of ideologically inspired budget cutting is to save a few bucks with the right hand while the left hand picks the right hand's pocket. Hidden costs - economists call them "externalities"..

internal blog link: http://transparencycanada.blogspot.ca/2012/10/charbonneau-commission-when.html

Charbonneau Commission: when transparency dies

            Writing this blog has been instructive. The ambient cynicism / political passivity has probably insulated me from the important role transparency plays in healthy political, social and economic systems. I am surprised to discover the degree to which democratic societies are hostage to the word. Who controls the word and how it is spun controls (in the short run, at least) the nature of the political game and the power relations among the various players.

            I have come to look for examples of what happens when transparency breaks down, when structures and political actors become opaque, when information does not flow freely, when news is distorted or "spun" to attribute a desired meaning or signification to an event..

             The province of Québec is a "small" society. Demographically and, especially, ethnolinguistically, it is a small island of francophonie in English speaking North America. This status, this mentality, has its advantages and its disadvantages. The relatively lowered mobility of our elites (the language issue) means that our big shots - nos gros légumes - know each other. They inhabit a small world, evolved from the ancestral farming village where you knew your neighbors and were probably related to them. "You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours" was a survival strategy before the invention of the modern State and insurance policies. Unfortuantely this philosophy, in modern societies, leads all too often to political corruption and the exploitation of unfair advantages: those with money purchase politicians and judges. Québec, as a small society, must therefore constantly be vigilant to eradicate corruption. The seeds of the disease must be extirpated before they have time to spread and infect the entire culture.

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Charbonneau+Commission+Lino+Zambito+points+finger/7331677/story.html

                The Charbonneau Commission is investigating corruption in the provincial construction industry. Evidence is coming forth in Montréal that a cartel of ten favored contractors received the lion's share of contracts with the provincial or municipal governments.This favoritism was bought with kickbacks to politicians and "taxes" payed to the Mob (about 3% of project cost in the city of Montréal). Cartel members, in turn, inflated their costs in order to pay for this privilege. And of course, in the final analysis, it is the poor taxpayer who foots the bill. We pay about 30% more for provincial tenders than in the neighboring province of Ontario, for example. How much of that difference is due to political corruption in the construction industry? Perhaps the Charbonneau Commission will shed some light into dark corners. (I suspect a horror movie is coming..)

                 This is what the breakdown of transparency engenders in modern, nominally democratic, societies: public theft, gangsterism, public apathy and cynicism toward the political process. Our declining infrastructure - some shoddily constructed in the first place - has reached the point of posing a physical danger to the public.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2006/10/01/overpass-collapse.html