Dirk Schulze-Makuch, Louis N Irwin: Life in the Universe, expectations and constraints (Springer-Verlag, 2006) 172 pages, extensive references.
Detail of active ice surface of Jupiter's moon Europe. Is there life in the ocean under that thin ice shield?
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA00502
Click on image for enlargement
Another ecosystem in our solar system?
http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/153110702753621385?cookieSet=1&journalCode=ast
How would satellite based remote detection or a robotic space probe
recognize the presence of life within our own solar system or on
exoplanets?
The short answer: search for indicators of
1- adequate energy flows
2-
chemical cycling: auto-regenerating reactive cycles employing an
external energy source (solar energy, chemical energy stored in mineral
reserves..). Special attention should be payed to strong chemical
disequilibria of chemical species susceptible of incorporation in
biological processes (O2, N2, CH4..)
3- presence of a suitable solvent for biochemical reactions in sufficient quantities
4- polymeric chemistry capable of storing and transmitting information necessary for the maintenance and propagation of life.
"Astrobiology studies the origin, evolution, distribution, and the fate
of life throughout the universe." Thus begins this fascinating trek
into a nascent Space Age science, the logical twin of Astrophysics.
What, then, is life, the subject mattter of Astrobiology's study?
Students of Self-Organization Theory will feel themselves at home with
the authors' definition. One can even conclude that Astrobiology itself
is a projective application of Self-Organization..
- Life consists of bounded
microenvironments in thermodynamic disequilibrium with their
surrounding. Energy and selected chemical species constantly flow across
the boundaries of the organism. The living, metabolizing cell is
characterized by a high internal energy content (stored chemical energy:
sugar, starch, fat, oil..) and low internal entropy (high degree of
functional organization usually structured hierarchally into several
levels)
- Life
transforms energy and matter obtained from the environment to maintain
low internal entropy (highly structured interior). The cell's /
organism's boundary is "porous" and "selective". Energy flows
continually through the metabolizing cell, energy used to regenerate the
cell / organism: "autopoiesis" (self-production). Creationists aside,
autopoiesis does NOT violate the 2nd (or any other) law of
thermodynamics. Autopoiesis represents the physical work extracted from
the energy flow passing through the cell's / organism's boundary. The
internal order - low entropy - of the living cell is, in fact,
overcompensated by the amount of degraded energy - high entropy -
leaving the cell. The cell's activity thus produces a net increase itn
the universe's entropy, satisfying the 2nd law of thermodynamics :-D
(Sorry, "intelligent" designers..)
-
Life encodes and transmits information. Info is transmitted through
genetic codes (DNA), allowing the organized complexity of species to
perpetuate across generations, despite the mortality of individual
organisms. Useful changes in the genetic code - mutations, epigenetic
modifications - must be incorporated into the transmitted code to
provide evolutionary adaptations over time. At the individual level,
novel experiences are encoded in modifications of nervous systems (or
molecular cycles and DNA changes in microbes). Learning, from microbe to
mammal, allows for adaptive behavioral change of both individual and
societies of individuals.
I consider this book a rare chance for the layman to grasp the
principles and a good part of the details of an emergent science before
it becomes complicated, arcane and specialized into proliferating
subdisciplines. In this sense, it is comparable to Darwin's Origin of Species, a highly readable scientific classic accessible to the nonspecialist reader.
What would life elsewhere look like? Most of the biomass on earth - a
planet conducive to the emergence of complex, multicellular life - is,
in fact, microbial. Even large organisms, like humans, can be viewed as
symbiotic colonies of (microbe-derived) cells which, in turn,
incorporate symbiotic microbial colonies: the intestinal bacteria we
"use" to digest our food and synthesize essential vitamins. Physical and
informational constraints favor small size even on our planet so
favored for the evolution of macro-organisms. one can only conclude that
most life in the universe will be microbial in nature.
Life should not be a rare phenomenon: hundreds of exoplanets orbiting
other stars are now catalogued. If earth is taken as a standard, life
evolves early whenever the physio-chemical and energetic conditions for
its emergence arise. Life is, above all, opportunistic. We would expect
to find harbors of life peppered fairly densely throughout the hundred
odd billion stars of our home galaxy - not to mention the hundreds of
billions of other galaxies.
Nevertheless, once established, life tends toward conservatism: if it
ain't broke don't fix it. If environments remain stable, stabilizing
selection will actually narrow the range of phenotypic (and underlying
genetic) variation. Thus the vast body of microbial biomass living below
our feet in the soil and underlying rock has remained simple and
archaic, ancestral forms from which the complex life of the surface
emerged: "organisms will remain static as long as the environment does."
When change - evolution - occurs it is usually as a reponse to
environmental change and is rapid, involving extinction and
replacement, not gradual change. Thus most life elsewhere is probably
structurally and physiologically simple and archaic - as on earth.
However, the emerging (meta-)science of Self-Organization Theory
strongly suggests that the above considerations paint only a partial
picture. Life is opportunistic and will seek (through selective
advantage) to occupy - or even create - new ecological niches through
modification of the physical environment. Thus, large, more complex
organisms - more efficently exploiting specialized ecological niches -
would aslo be expected to evolve over time, physical conditions
permitting. Example: an atmosphere containing oxygen to fuel the high
octane metabolisms required for the mobility of large organisms. Such
"higher" organisms require favorable physical environments , a long time
to evolve, and are higly energivore. We would expect them to be a
relative rarity in the universe. Similar arguments apply to the
emergence of intelligence: intelligent life should exist elsewhere but
as an exception, a rarity.
Finally, taking earth and its biological history as a typical "case
study", we would expect life to appear most easily and evolve most
diversely on worlds presenting a larger variety of environments: deep
seas, shallow coastal waters, wetlands, a variety of emerged lands
(humid, semi-arid, arid, cold, temperate, tropical..) Once again, in
comparing earth with other planetary bodies and moons in our solar
system, earth appears to belong to a class of planets especially favored
for the emergence and flourishing of life.
One of the essential requirements for life is the presence of
"adequate" energy fluxes. In a sense, energy is the essence of life. A
continuous regulated energy flow through the boundaries of an organism
maintains life. Without this flow the organism either dies or creates
inert - non-metabolizing - copies of its genetic code, for example.
spores. Spores remain inert until conditions propice for life reappear
at which time they reconstitute the parent organism of which they are
clones. Energy flow, in the modern materialistic view of life is the
analog of the "vital force" and "soul" of primitive and pre-scientific
Western thought.
The energy flow transversing the boundaries of an organism is used to
perform the work of self-reparation and maintenance as well as perform
physiochemical work: muscular effort; registering, encoding and storing
information derived from the environment and internal body states
(neurological activity); production of eggs, embryos or other
biomaterials (silk, spiderweb, toxins..)
On earth, there are two primary energy sources exploited by life: 1-
photosynthesis by plants and bacteria and 2- redox chemical reactions
(liberating energy stored in inorganic mineral substrates
(chemoautotrophy). The chemoautotrophic bacteria, Thiobacillus
ferooxidans, extracts energy from minerals by oxydizing sulfur or iron.
On earth heterotrophic organisms (incapable of extracting their energy
directly from the environment) such as herbivores and carnivores exploit
secondary energy sources found in the energy rich molecules synthesized
by primary producers such as plants. The rich, diversified ecosystems
of energy rich earth typically have several "trophic" levels in the food
chain (or web): autotrophic ("self-feeding") primary producers like
plants that capture energy from sunlight and store it in energy rich
biomolecules (sugars, starches, oils, fats..), heterotrophic ("feeding
off others") herbivores which obtain their energy inputs by eating
plants, primary carnivores which obtain energy concentrated in the
tissues of herbivores. Follow secondary and tertiary carnivores,
omnivores (which obtain energy from several distincts sources: plants,
herbivores, even lower trophic level carnivores, detritus..), and,
finally, detrivores which extract residual energy found in dead /
decomposing organic matter. Detrivores form an essential link in the
food web by "re-mineralizing" dead organic matter into a form utilizable
by photosynthetic plants. Nature, is above all, the Great Recycler -
nothing is wasted!
On earth sunlight and chemical energy are equivalent in terms of their
relative energy yield (energy density). Both are widely employed, to the
excusion of other potential energy sources (thermal energy, kinetic
energy of currents of water or air, the earth's magnetic field..)
However, the potential biological use of other forms of energy is shown
by the fact that terrestrial organisms use the earth's gravitational and
magnetic fields as well as biogenetic electric fields to obtain
information about their environment: orientation with respect to the
gravitational field, navigation of birds and eels, location of prey by
electric field detection.. It is arguable that on earth these
alternative energy sources were simply outcompeted by the abundance of
light and chemical energy and were relegated to sensory functions. On
other worlds - Jupiter's "water world" moon, Europa, for example - light
is absent as an energy source and other forms of energy may be used to
power metabolic processes. (If life exists on Europa, it will most
likely be found in a global ocean, beneath a planetary ice shield dozens
of kilometers thick - no light could penetrate such a thickness of
ice.)
Several potential energy sources are explored and found capable of
providing biologically useful amounts of energy. # 1 - 4 in the
following list look particularly promising even for energy hungry
multicellular life. # 5 - 6 may still provide usable energy densities
for microorganisms:
1-
thermal energy (example: volcanic or other internal heat sources which
maintain Europa's ocean above the freezing point despite its great
distance from the sun)
2- kinetic energy of currents of air or water
3-
osmotic gradients (differences in solute concentations across a
biological membrane. The energy flux transversing the organism is used
"pump" solute molecules inside / outside of the membrane thus storing
energy - for later metabolic use - in the osmotic gradient)
4-
ionic gradients (differences in ionic species concentration across a
biological membrane such as salinity gradients. Same principle as omotic
energy storage. On earth ionic gradients across cell walls are use to
power nerve impulses and muscle contraction. The energy stored in the
ionic gradient was originally obtained from the chemical energy
contained in food.)
5-
radiation (example: dissociation of water in the ice shield of Europa by
magnetically induced radiative flux. The energy in the radiative flux -
charged particles accelerated by Jupiter's intense revolving magnetic
field - is transfered to liberated atoms of hydrogen and oxygen which
would then be employed by microorganisms living in water inclusions in
the shield ice. Alternatively, some oxygen could diffuse through the ice
shield for use by primitive organisms living on the underside of the
ice shield, "ice roof dwellers")
6-
magnetic field (Jupiter's magnetic field is 12 times as strong as
earth's and therefore could be directly employed as an energy source by
European organisms with the energy stored, for example, in energy rich
biomolecules.)
7- gravitational field
8- pressure gradients
9- tectonic forces
The last three potential energy sources are less promising from an
energetic viewpoint but cannot be totally excluded in extreme
environmental conditions. Example: large planet with intense
gravitational field or pressure gradients.
One conclusion seems fairly well established by modern biology. Life as
we understand it requires a liquid phase to exist: liquids provide the
required density and mobility of bioreactant molecules. The authors
examine alternative solvents for biochemistry. For a variety of reasons
water appears to be the most suitable solvent: large thermal band in
which it remains liquid, high heat of vaporization, proper degree of
reactivity with carbon compounds, electrical polarity of the water
molecule, etc. Once again, Earth - the "blue planet" because of its
oceans - appears to be a cosmic niche particularly suited for life to
evolve and to evolve to high levels of complexity and organization.
At
lower temperatures - upper cyrogenic range - a saturated ammonia /
water solution might serve as a biological solvent. Saturated NH3 / H20
geysers - indicating, perhaps, subsurface oceans - have been detected on
several of the large moons of the outer solar system (Io, Triton..)
Several of these bodies seem to possses adequate energy fluxes,
essential for life to emerge. Potential sources of these energy fluxes
are gravitational flexing, radioactive metallic planetary cores and
induced electric currents in liquid iron cores exposed to Jupiter's
intense magnetic field. In addition, several of these bodies exhibit
self-regenerating chemical cycles driven by energy fluxes (Titan, Io,
Europa, Triton, some levels of Venus' atmosphere..). Such cycles are
considered to be the precursors of life. It should be empasized though
that the mere presence of such chemical cycyling does not, in itself,
indicate the presence of life, merely the POSSIBILITY of life. Titan - a
moon of Saturn - shows signs of polymeric chemistry. Thus Titan meets
the four requirements of life stated at the beginning of this review:
1- adequate energy flux, 2- chemical cycling, 3- suitable solvents
(liquid methane and ethane are possibly suitable biosolvents at low -
cyrogenic - temperatures) and 4- polymeric chemistry. Whether any body
in our solar system other than earth possesses life is debatable but at
least we know what to look for and we are already registering several
potential candidates. Microbes and photosynthetic algae may florish on
Mars. Europa may harbor marine life the size of shrimp or small fish
beneath its ice shield. Because of low temperatures life, if it existed
on places like Io, Titan or Triton would be "exotic", probably microbial
life existing in saturated ammonia water solution, liquid methane /
ethane, or liquid nitrogen. Such life, at this stage of our knowlege,
is, of course, highly speculative. Mars and Europa are our best bets for
"life as we know it".
Interestingly, the authors throw out the popular notion of a "habitable
zone" around stars. The idea might still prove useful in the search for
earthlike habitats though. It is now recognized that the conventional
habitable zone hypothesis is too restrictive, especially for hardy
microbial life. Contemporary knowledge of planet formation indicates
that planets (or large mooons) pass through an early accretion phase
(through gravitational attraction). The infalling matter heats the
forming body (kinetic energy). Since water is abundant, one would expect
many bodies to pass a part of their existence with a water covered
surface. Depending upon the size, chemical composition and distance from
the star, millions to billions of years might pass before all the water
was frozen. This might give life a chance to evolve, even if the body
does not lie within the conventional "habitable zone". We might
therefore find fossil microbial - perhaps macroscopic - life forms on
Mars and some of the large moons of the outer solar system.
Alternatively, on some cooling worlds microbial life (in particular)
might be able to pull off the transiton from say, a saturated NH3 / H2O
solution to another, low temperature, solvent like liquid ammonia,
methane or nitrogen. Don't be TOO surprised if frigid Triton (a moon of
Uranus covered with nitrogen snow) harbors microbes breeding in
underground liquid nitrogen oceans using a free radical based chemistry
(those nasty free radicals which our bodies spend so much effort
destroying and which we attempt to destroy by popping anti-oxidant
pills). At low temperatures, the chemical reactions our bodies use are
too sluggish to fuel life. Free radical chemistry would fit the bill
although at the temperatures our biology operates at free radical
chemistry is "too hot to handle" and free radicals damage the integrity
of infomation carrying biomolecules causing cellular aging and
pre-cancerous genetic damage.
The authors conclude with a list of "biosignatures" and "geoindicators"
- chemical species and landform modifications - which a satellite based
remote life detection program might employ. The number of "hits" in our
solar system is quite surprising.
This is a technical monograph - published by Springer Verlag - intended
for a scientifically literate audience. Technical terms are generally
not defined and there is no glossary. A few graphics lack clarity. On
the whole, tight, very compact, generally well written. Excellent reading.